Monday, August 19, 2019
The Bible as a Historical Document :: Research Religion Mark Religious Papers
The Bible as a Historical Document      MARK'S THEOLOGY REFLECTED IN WRITING            Mark and the other evangelists used basically five ways to change,  edit or enhance Jesus' sayings to reflect their own views of Christianity.  According to the Five Gospels Book, plagiarism and changing of writing was  not a crime, but actually very common Mark's time.  Besides, Mark never  knew Jesus first-hand, he somehow had to make a 'story' from basically  Hearsay!            Mark groups different parables and sayings of Jesus by topic;  making a false impression that these things happened in order.  This may  have little effect on changing the meaning of the lesson, however it  illustrates the fact that Mark was trying to author a "readable" story for  people, rather than a book of facts.  The best example would be in Mark  10:17-31 (Jesus Counsel to the Rich) & (Parable of The Camel and the Eye  of a Needle). It is doubtful that these things happened at the same time;  however, they are GREY in The Five Gospels anyway ... and probably didn't  happen as Mark describes.  This brings us to Mark's writing style.            Mark seems to "tack-on" sentences to Jesus' teachings to make them  more "Christian."  This really changes the meaning more than any other  tactic!  Who knows what Mark may have edited-out to accomplish what he  wanted to impress upon his readers?  In this, he tries to interpret the  meaning of Jesus' actions ... and does this in a misleading way. For  example: Mark 2:19, Jesus regarding Fasting.  Jesus makes a strong  statement against importance to fasting, but Mark (in 2:20) tags on:            "But the days will come when the bridegroom will be taken away  from them, and they will fast in those days."            This blatantly shows that Mark held higher regard for the Old  Traditions of Fasting rather than Jesus' new teachings!  This is also an  example of "Christianizing Jesus" according to traditions that have  already earned respect from Jews in their tradition. (Wow, this is  starting to sound like a fight between Today's Political Parties, isn't  it? [Jesus = Liberal Politics / Judaism = Conservative Politics]).            Finally, Mark likes to "soften the blow" of Jesus' Hard sayings.   He does this for probably the same reason Paul preached that Circumcision  was not required for Christians.  					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.